The list below is an only a summary description of the Evaluation Criteria. Detailed
criteria are available in the Evaluation Rubric Candidates and packet check the rubric that the
packet includes evidence that aligns with the rubric.
Knowledge and use of effective, active, and engaging pedagogy
Strong candidates will regularly and extensively incorporate
activities that meaningfully engage learners in their courses.
Learner- and student-centeredness
Strong candidates will indicate their recognition that students learn
differently and that students play an important role in the learning
beyond the role of passive listener.
Equity and inclusion
All candidates should demonstrate through their course design and other activities
that the candidate has already taken action to in their teaching and courses to create
an inclusive and equitable learning environment at Penn State.
Alignment between teaching and learning
Strong candidates link what they do in their courses with what they expect of
students. This is reflected by consistency between their teaching philosophy,
student learning expectations, course objectives, coursework (e.g. in-class
activities, assignments, exams), and grading practices.
Passion for teaching and students’ learning
All candidates will communicate excitement and enthusiasm for teaching and student
learning in their philosophy and course materials, and through the testimonials of
students in their letters of support.
Sharing teaching and learning expertise
Strong candidates will have extended their teaching and learning experience
and/or expertise to other faculty and the larger academic community.
Eisenhower award recipients' packets must demonstrate shared teaching expertise
within Penn State, teaching mentorship of Penn State faculty, and a career-long
committment to teaching excellence.
